This was just a few words too long for a tweet.
Exhibit A: The University of Buffalo is about to publish a paper "Equal Opportunity Objectification? The Sexualization of Men and Women on the Cover of Rolling Stone," in which they examined over forty years of Rolling Stone covers to determine that women are more objectified than men and that women are more objectified than they were in 1967 on the cover of Rolling Stone.
Exhibit B: Psych Central posts an article about the paper in which they use one photo. This photo is not a Rolling Stone cover and shows two women who are clearly quite willing to be comfortable with each other for the camera.
Exhibit C: Business Insider posts an article sourcing the Psych Central article that uses many Rolling Stone covers for illustration, clearly showing women being sexualized.
Exhibit D: Tease.TheDailyWhat picks up the Business insider article exclusively for the photos. They were formerly Hawtness after all.
Exhibit E: I had to dig to find the photo of a sexualized male subject on the cover of the Rolling Stone to use for this post.
Facebook | MySpace | Twitter | Digg | Reddit | Stumble |
Comics
AppleGeeks
Ctrl+Alt+Del
Doonesbury
FoxTrot
Indexed
Joy of Tech
Penny Arcade
Player Vs. Player
RealLife
Romantically Apocalyptic
Sinfest
Three Panel Soul
Wondermark
XKCD
Blogs
Photography is Not a Crime
Almost Diamonds
As I See It
Black and WTF
Caerwyn Farm and Spirits
The Catty Life
Domestic Sluttery
Engrish
FAIL
Gizmodo
Greg Laden
Le Zèbre Bleu
Lefse and Kimchee
Lifehacker
Light-test
Linux in Exile
Man Bytes Blog
Post Secret
Photoshop Disasters
Arts
The Sports Show
Minneapolis Institue of Arts
02/19/2012—05/13/2012
Mythbusters: The Explosive Exhibition
Museum of Science and Industry
03/15/2012—09/03/2012
The World at Work: Images of Labor and Industry, 1850 to Now
Minneapolis Institue of Arts
12/22/2012—09/01/2013
More Real? Art in the Age of Truthiness
Minneapolis Institue of Arts
03/02/2013—06/02/2013
Music
Please wait while my tweets load
